Advertisement

Previous Entry | Next Entry

More Palin Nonsense

  • Oct. 23rd, 2008 at 11:37 PM
Pissed
When asked if she was a feminist, the Gov responded (from NBC):

"I'm not gonna label myself anything, Brian. And I think that's what annoys a lot of Americans, especially in a political campaign, is to start trying to label different parts of America different, different backgrounds, different … I'm not going to put a label on myself. "


Um, excuse me? Remember that clip I posted yesterday, where she labeled herself a federalist? Remember the 4000 times she called herself a Hockey Mom? Pitbull? MAVERICK! REFORMER! WASHINGTON OUTSIDER! THESE ARE LABELS! YOU LABELED PARTS OF AMERICA "PRO-AMERICA!" AND YES THAT LABELING ANNOYS ME. YOU, MA'AM, ANNOY ME. PLEASE REMOVE YOURSELF FROM MY POLITICAL DISCOURSE. SON OF A BITCH.

Sorry about that. I just had to get that off my chest.

PS-In other batshit crazy political news (warning: this is nine minutes long):



PPS-I need to blog about other stuff. Future generations will look back on this blog and say "It was pretty good until it got all political."

Comments

( 5 comments — Leave a comment )
[info]tjackson wrote:
Oct. 24th, 2008 04:54 am (UTC)
yikes this lady is nutzo.

i know i IM'd you it, but i'll link it here for others
http://www.twincities.com/ci_10771368
[info]tjackson wrote:
Oct. 24th, 2008 05:03 am (UTC)
I think the Palin refusal to label herself is the attempt to somehow recover some measure of voters.

She's managed to put herself out there with labels that are rather unsubstantial (maverick? really, that's not that qualitative) ... and now in an attempt to recover she has to do one of three things; a) appear wishywashy and completely deny these views that have obvious negative connotations and aren't helping her agenda, b) remain silent on the matter, or c) restate the views she has already stated. I know that's rather obvious, but if you're in the midst of an effort to prove your qualifications for yourself, as it has been repeatedly pointed out that she keeps referring to her own qualifications in first person plural (leeching off mccain's), she's got little ground to stand on. A) is unsubstantial, which is already the case against her. B) appears weak on the matter. C) is digging her own grave.

I don't know where I'm going with this, but odds are I'll remember and post, yet another comment. ;)

Also, this interview blows ... talking over one another is recockulous.
[info]tjackson wrote:
Oct. 29th, 2008 05:37 am (UTC)
The Daily Show finally used that 'governor would you label yourself a feminist' interview. So ... NOW i know about it. Gosh I need cable or something to give me real news, the internet is ... great of bill cosby comparisons, but that's about it ;)
[info]serialcrusher wrote:
Jan. 2nd, 2009 05:43 am (UTC)
I just went back and read this post and I have to say, I am a funny guy.
[info]tjackson wrote:
Jan. 2nd, 2009 04:34 pm (UTC)
what a 'crack up' you are
( 5 comments — Leave a comment )

Profile

Write
[info]serialcrusher
serialcrusher

Latest Month

October 2009
S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow